The RNA Revolution in Agriculture: Innovation or Invisible Risk?

 Introduction: Who and When?

Terrana Biosciences is an ag‑biotech company officially launched on July 1, 2025, by Flagship Pioneering, the Cambridge‑, Massachusetts‑based venture firm best known for founding Moderna and other biotech startups AgTechNavigator.com+7AgTechNavigator.com+7LinkedIn+7. Founded in 2021 and unveiled publicly in mid‑2025, Terrana received an initial US $50 million funding commitment from Flagship after four years in stealth development Flagship Pioneering+7Flagship Pioneering+7Stock Titan+7.

Key founders include Noubar Afeyan (Co‑founder, CEO of Flagship), Ignacio Martinez (Executive Chair, General Partner at Flagship), and Ryan Rapp (Co‑founder and CEO of Terrana), supported by a leadership team with deep expertise in RNA biology, plant pathology, regulatory affairs, and agricultural science AgFunderNews+6Flagship Pioneering+6Stock Titan+6.

---

What Is Terrana Biosciences? RNA Technology + RNAi

Terrana is pioneering a proprietary RNA‑based technology platform for agriculture. This platform delivers RNA solutions that interact with plant biology to provide protection, resilience, and trait enhancement without altering plant DNA or the genome AgTechNavigator.com+13Flagship Pioneering+13Stock Titan+13.

Key Features of the Platform

• Generative RNA design: Using AI and advanced computational modeling, Terrana has built a vast library of self‑replicating, plant‑derived RNA molecules and a design system that can engineer new functional traits rapidly and precisely Stock Titan+2iGrow News+2Stock Titan+2.

• Non‑GMO, transcript‑based action: The RNA molecules can be applied as foliar sprays or seed treatments, enter plants naturally (through micro‑tears in leaves), and persist internally to replicate within plant tissue—unlike conventional RNA sprays that degrade quickly on surfaces AgFunderNews+2Chemical & Engineering News+2New AG International+2.

• Three product classes—“Prevent, Protect, Improve”:

  • Prevent: Small RNAs act like “plant vaccines”, priming immune systems to recognize viruses before infection.

  • Protect: Delivers RNA cargos such as peptides or protein precursors (e.g. Cry proteins) to fight ongoing bacterial, fungal, or viral threats.

  • Improve: Carries RNA that promotes desirable traits like drought tolerance, cold or heat resilience, or development regulators Tech News 180+8AgFunderNews+8New AG International+8.

This approach is often compared to software in plants—load the RNA “code”, and the plant responds accordingly in real time.

Project ARTICHOKE: The CIA’s Pursuit of Mind Control in the Shadows of the Cold War

In the early 1950s, amid Cold War paranoia and rising fears of Soviet psychological warfare, the United States embarked on a dark and secretive quest: to control the human mind. Project ARTICHOKE, one of the earliest covert CIA programs, sought to explore whether a person could be broken, reprogrammed, or even turned into an unwilling assassin. While often overshadowed by its successor, MK-ULTRA, ARTICHOKE laid the foundational work for what would become the most controversial psychological experiments in American intelligence history.

---

Origins of the Program

Project ARTICHOKE was officially launched in 1951, but its roots lie in an earlier program known as Project BLUEBIRD, which began in 1950. BLUEBIRD was born out of growing fears that U.S. prisoners of war in Korea and Eastern Bloc countries were being brainwashed by communist regimes. The CIA wanted to understand how such psychological manipulation worked—and more importantly, whether it could be replicated or reversed.

In 1951, as the scope of the program expanded, BLUEBIRD was rebranded as ARTICHOKE. The project fell under the jurisdiction of the CIA’s Office of Scientific Intelligence and the Office of Security, with key figures such as Dr. Sidney Gottlieb and Morris Allen overseeing operations.

MK-DELTA: The CIA's Covert Chem-Bio Operations Program

 Introduction

At the height of Cold War paranoia, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) launched a series of covert projects aimed at manipulating the human mind. Among these was MK-DELTA, a lesser-known but critically important operation. Overshadowed by its infamous cousin MK-ULTRA, MK-DELTA was the operational branch that sought to take laboratory findings and test them in the field—often on unwitting human subjects. This article delves into the who, what, when, where, and why of MK-DELTA and explores whether such programs still have modern-day parallels.

---

The Origins: Who Was Behind MK-DELTA?

MK-DELTA was a project initiated and controlled by the CIA’s Directorate of Plans (DD/P), the agency's covert operations division. It was overseen by the Technical Services Division (TSD), responsible for creating espionage tools, chemical substances, and behavioral control mechanisms.

The program was officially sanctioned on October 20, 1952, predating the more famous MK-ULTRA by several months. While MK-ULTRA focused on research and development—studying the effects of drugs like LSD, mescaline, and barbiturates—MK-DELTA was created to deploy these substances in real-world scenarios, particularly in foreign clandestine operations.

At the highest level, MK-DELTA was authorized and shielded by top CIA officials, including then-Director Allen Dulles, who believed psychological warfare and chemical agents were the next frontier in intelligence operations.

MK Naomi: A Cold War Biological Weapons Program and Its Modern Implications

Introduction

MK Naomi was a clandestine program conducted by the United States during the Cold War, focused on the development and stockpiling of biological and chemical agents for covert operations. As a successor to the infamous MKULTRA program, MK Naomi represents a shadowy chapter in U.S. intelligence history, raising ethical questions about biological warfare and government secrecy. This article explores the who, what, when, where, and why of MK Naomi, drawing on available historical records, and examines whether similar activities persist today, as of July 22, 2025.The Who: Key Players in MK NaomiMK Naomi was a joint initiative between the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), specifically involving the CIA’s Technical Services Division (TSD) and the Army’s Special Operations Division at Fort Detrick, Maryland. The TSD, responsible for developing tools and techniques for espionage, collaborated with Fort Detrick’s biological warfare experts to create and test agents. Key figures remain largely anonymous due to the program’s secrecy and the destruction of records, but high-level CIA and DOD officials likely oversaw operations. Scientists and researchers at Fort Detrick, including microbiologists and chemists, played critical roles in developing biological agents, while CIA operatives handled the covert application of these materials.The What: Scope and ActivitiesMK Naomi aimed to develop a robust arsenal of biological and chemical agents for clandestine use, including lethal and incapacitating materials. The program focused on creating delivery systems such as dart guns, aerosol devices, and poisonous pills, designed for espionage, assassination, or sabotage. It explored agents targeting humans, animals, and crops, with a 1967 CIA memo revealing covert techniques for poisoning crops under field conditions. Specific developments included darts coated with biological agents, pills for covert administration, and agents to incapacitate or awaken guard dogs, indicating a broad scope for intelligence operations. The program also stockpiled toxins, notably 11 grams of shellfish toxin, which was retained covertly after the program’s dissolution.MK Naomi was a successor to MKULTRA, which focused on mind control but shifted toward biological and chemical warfare. It operated under strict secrecy, with limited documentation, and was part of a broader U.S. biological weapons program initiated in 1941 to counter perceived threats from adversaries like the Soviet Union.

MK-Ultra: The Shadow of Mind Control in America

In the secretive halls of Cold War-era intelligence, few programs remain as chilling or controversial as MK-Ultra—a covert CIA operation that delved into the limits of human psychology, behavior control, and chemical influence. Once buried in classified documents, MK-Ultra has since become a symbol of governmental overreach, raising profound questions about autonomy, ethics, and hidden experimentation.

Even decades after its exposure, the legacy of MK-Ultra continues to spark debate—not only about what happened but about what might still be happening under different names, in newer forms, behind locked doors and non-disclosure agreements.

---

The Birth of MK-Ultra

MK-Ultra was officially sanctioned by CIA Director Allen Dulles on April 13, 1953, in the early years of the Cold War. Fueled by fears that the Soviet Union and China had mastered psychological manipulation techniques—particularly brainwashing—U.S. intelligence sought to close the perceived gap.

At the center of the operation was Sidney Gottlieb, a chemist and CIA officer who believed that behavior could be shaped, altered, and ultimately controlled through the use of drugs, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, and psychological trauma. MK-Ultra was not a single experiment but a vast, decentralized program encompassing over 150 sub-projects, many of which were contracted out to universities, prisons, hospitals, and research centers across the United States and Canada.

Arctic Sea Ice in 2025: A Surprising Snapshot Amid Climate Narratives

 In July 2025, data from the Canadian Ice Service (CIS) revealed an unexpected finding: sea ice coverage in the Western Arctic from June 25 to July 16 was above average, marking the third-highest level in over 20 years and surpassing measurements from 1981, when tracking began. This snapshot, drawn from official government statistics, contrasts sharply with decades of alarmist predictions about vanishing Arctic ice, famously championed by figures like Al Gore, who in 2006 predicted an ice-free Arctic by 2013-2014.

The data, detailed by sources like Climate Science Press, has sparked debate, especially given past controversies. In 2017, National Geographic’s viral video of a starving polar bear fueled climate change fears, only for the outlet to later admit the bear’s condition wasn’t conclusively tied to sea ice loss—a narrative built on speculation. Similarly, Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth faced scrutiny, with a 2007 UK court ruling citing nine inaccuracies, including exaggerated sea ice claims.

While the 2025 figures highlight a strong year for Western Arctic ice, they don’t negate the broader trend. CIS and NSIDC data confirm a ~12% per-decade decline in Arctic sea ice since 1979, with multi-year ice at historic lows. The 2025 anomaly likely reflects short-term weather patterns or ice drift, not a reversal of long-term loss. Critics argue the shift from “global warming” to “climate change” as a catch-all term allows activists to link unrelated events—like wildfires or tsunamis—to climate narratives, often muddling the science.

This single data point won’t likely sway staunch advocates, but it underscores the complexity of Arctic ice dynamics. For detailed charts and data, visit ice-glaces.ec.gc.ca or nsidc.org.

https://clashdaily.com/2025/07/latest-arctic-ice-measurements-are-in-someone-get-al-gore-a-tissue/

(Disclaimer: Chat GPT & Grok Information and article generated)

Is Barack Obama Obama going to jail?

On December 9, 2016, a high-level meeting convened in the White House Situation Room, reportedly ordered by President Barack Obama, has sparked significant controversy and speculation. Allegations from recent posts on X suggest that this meeting, attended by Lisa Monaco, Mary McCord, Celeste Wallander, Victoria Nuland, Andrew McCabe, and John Brennan, was part of a concerted effort to fabricate intelligence linking President-elect Donald Trump to Russia, framing it as a “cabal” to undermine his 2016 election victory. However, a closer examination of the meeting’s context and the roles of these key figures reveals a more nuanced reality rooted in national security concerns about Russian interference.…

 https://open.substack.com/pub/conspiracyunearthed/p/unveiling-the-december-9-2016-white?selection=8cc4b69e-0bb7-4637-9ac4-3a70a51c53da&r=5zixan&utm_medium=ios